On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Wolfgang Denk <w...@denx.de> wrote: > Dear Grant Likely, > > In message <fa686aa40905061340s212385b1r8be4e2f7505bd...@mail.gmail.com> you > wrote: >> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Wolfgang Denk <w...@denx.de> wrote: >> > From: Piotr Ziecik <ko...@semihalf.com> >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Piotr Ziecik <ko...@semihalf.com> >> > Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <w...@denx.de> >> > Cc: Grant Likely <grant.lik...@secretlab.ca> >> > Cc: John Rigby <jcri...@gmail.com> >> >> Missing patch description.  Otherwise looks okay. > > This is a repeating complaint. Do I really need an extra  description > for a trivial patch that does exactly what the Subject: says?
Fair enough. I was going through your series pretty quickly and this one doesn't really need it. However, in this particular case, I think I would rather see both .dts rework patches put into the same patch so it can be reviewed all at once. g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
