Dear Grant Likely, In message <fa686aa40905061340s212385b1r8be4e2f7505bd...@mail.gmail.com> you wrote: > On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Wolfgang Denk <w...@denx.de> wrote: > > From: Piotr Ziecik <ko...@semihalf.com> > > > > Signed-off-by: Piotr Ziecik <ko...@semihalf.com> > > Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <w...@denx.de> > > Cc: Grant Likely <grant.lik...@secretlab.ca> > > Cc: John Rigby <jcri...@gmail.com> > > Missing patch description. Otherwise looks okay.
This is a repeating complaint. Do I really need an extra description for a trivial patch that does exactly what the Subject: says? What is recommended practice in such a case? Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de The software required `Windows 95 or better', so I installed Linux. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
