On Apr 29, 2009, at 6:44 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 10:49:07AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 20:18 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 11:31:37AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
+#ifdef CONFIG_IRQSTACKS

Wasn't there a plan to make CONFIG_IRQSTACKS the unconditional default?

Not sure. Looks like the 64-bit configs all turn it on, and all but one
or two of the 32-bit configs don't.

Yeah, but do they have a reason not to turn it on?  Having irqstacks
is a lot safer than no having it because the stack useage is a lot more
predictable.  And not having to maintain two codepathes is also a
benefit all by itself.

I think Ben, Paul and I had discussed just universally enabling it. Can't remember why Ben hadn't done that yet.

- k
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to