On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 10:49:07AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 20:18 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 11:31:37AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_IRQSTACKS > > > > Wasn't there a plan to make CONFIG_IRQSTACKS the unconditional default? > > Not sure. Looks like the 64-bit configs all turn it on, and all but one > or two of the 32-bit configs don't.
Yeah, but do they have a reason not to turn it on? Having irqstacks is a lot safer than no having it because the stack useage is a lot more predictable. And not having to maintain two codepathes is also a benefit all by itself. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
