On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 9:22 PM, Grant Likely <grant.lik...@secretlab.ca> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Eddie Dawydiuk <ed...@embeddedarm.com> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Let's try this one more time. The last patch was using the clocks for a >> custom board based on the Yosemite board and was referencing a non-existent >> ethNadr( I forgot to pull out this code out). > > But the question remains: Why do you need simpleboot support for > Yosemite when you can use a uImage or cuImage with u-boot?
On a more general note; this patch also diverges from the original model for simple image. The idea behind simpleimage was that it would contain a fully formed device tree, with no fixups necessary. I want to think carefully before diverging from that. Cheers, g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
