Peter Korsgaard wrote: > Why? Does it buy us anything to request_irq again for each channel? > > Now we're at it, it seems like there's a check for != NO_IRQ missing > in fsl_dma_chan_remove().
If the device tree doesn't specify an interrupts property in the device channel, then I think that's an error. All the device trees already do that. So where do you see this problem? -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
