Peter Korsgaard wrote: > @@ -875,7 +875,8 @@ static int __devinit fsl_dma_chan_probe(struct > fsl_dma_device *fdev, > } > > dev_info(fdev->dev, "#%d (%s), irq %d\n", new_fsl_chan->id, > - compatible, new_fsl_chan->irq); > + compatible, > + new_fsl_chan->irq != NO_IRQ ? new_fsl_chan->irq : fdev->irq);
Wouldn't it be better to make sure that, on 83xx, new_fsl_chan->irq has the same value as fdev->irq before we get here? -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
