On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 15:17 -0600, Kumar Gala wrote: > On Jan 13, 2009, at 2:59 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 09:21 -0600, Kumar Gala wrote: > >> Please pull from 'next' branch of > >> > >> (this is my last pull request of 'next' for 2.6.29. I would like > >> to see > >> the 'powerpc: Unify opcode definitions and support' patch go in but > >> leave > >> that for you to pull in directly). > > > > This is really very very very late for these changes, most of them > > aren't bug fixes at all... > > True. > > >> Anton Vorontsov (4): > >> powerpc/fsl_pci: Add MPC83xx PCI-E controller RC mode support > >> powerpc/83xx: Add PCI-E support for all MPC83xx boards with > >> PCI-E > > Would like to see this feature added into .29
Can you either rebase with just that (and bug fixes) ? Or stick that in another branch ? > >> powerpc/83xx: Make serial ports work on MPC8315E-RDB w/ FSL U- > >> Boots > > A sort of bug fix. Ok. > >> powerpc/83xx: Move mcu_mpc8349emitx driver out of drivers/i2c/ > >> chips/ > > At Jean's request to move i2c clients out of drivers/i2c. Ok. > >> Kumar Gala (2): > >> powerpc/fsl-booke: Cleanup init/exception setup to be runtime > >> powerpc/e500mc: Doorbells need to be taken w/exceptions disabled > > can wait for .30 Isn't the second one a clear bug fix ? > >> Trent Piepho (3): > >> powerpc/fsl-booke: Remove code duplication in lowmem mapping > >> powerpc/fsl-booke: Allow larger CAM sizes than 256 MB > >> powerpc/fsl-booke: Make CAM entries used for lowmem configurable > > Posted we'll before.. finally got around to reviewing them.. but can > wait for .30 > > So the real question I have is when does your next branch start > queuing up changes for .30? Soon :-) > I can completely live w/these not going into .29 if they can go into > your next branch for .30 Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
