On Jan 13, 2009, at 2:59 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 09:21 -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
Please pull from 'next' branch of
(this is my last pull request of 'next' for 2.6.29. I would like
to see
the 'powerpc: Unify opcode definitions and support' patch go in but
leave
that for you to pull in directly).
This is really very very very late for these changes, most of them
aren't bug fixes at all...
True.
Anton Vorontsov (4):
powerpc/fsl_pci: Add MPC83xx PCI-E controller RC mode support
powerpc/83xx: Add PCI-E support for all MPC83xx boards with
PCI-E
Would like to see this feature added into .29
powerpc/83xx: Make serial ports work on MPC8315E-RDB w/ FSL U-
Boots
A sort of bug fix.
powerpc/83xx: Move mcu_mpc8349emitx driver out of drivers/i2c/
chips/
At Jean's request to move i2c clients out of drivers/i2c.
Kumar Gala (2):
powerpc/fsl-booke: Cleanup init/exception setup to be runtime
powerpc/e500mc: Doorbells need to be taken w/exceptions disabled
can wait for .30
Trent Piepho (3):
powerpc/fsl-booke: Remove code duplication in lowmem mapping
powerpc/fsl-booke: Allow larger CAM sizes than 256 MB
powerpc/fsl-booke: Make CAM entries used for lowmem configurable
Posted we'll before.. finally got around to reviewing them.. but can
wait for .30
So the real question I have is when does your next branch start
queuing up changes for .30?
I can completely live w/these not going into .29 if they can go into
your next branch for .30
- k
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
