Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> > I don't know quite the detail of the new cpumask stuff ... It could be
> > as simple as passing a pointer instead of the value in the
> > cpumask_scnprintf call though...
>
> Actually, I'll do more tests and if that ends up being the only needed
> change, I'll push your patch with that small change out to powerpc next
> tonight.
Sorry about that, here's an incremental... let me know if you want the
whole thing re-posted.
Thanks.
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cacheinfo.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cacheinfo.c
index f3e3ae3..b33f041 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cacheinfo.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cacheinfo.c
@@ -611,7 +611,7 @@ static ssize_t shared_cpu_map_show(struct kobject *k,
struct kobj_attribute *att
len = PAGE_SIZE - 2;
if (len > 1) {
- n = cpumask_scnprintf(buf, len, cache->shared_cpu_map);
+ n = cpumask_scnprintf(buf, len, &cache->shared_cpu_map);
buf[n++] = '\n';
buf[n] = '\0';
}
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
