> I don't know quite the detail of the new cpumask stuff ... It could be > as simple as passing a pointer instead of the value in the > cpumask_scnprintf call though...
Actually, I'll do more tests and if that ends up being the only needed change, I'll push your patch with that small change out to powerpc next tonight. Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
