Hi Ben,
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 07:56:32 +1100 Benjamin Herrenschmidt
<b...@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2008-12-23 at 01:25 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Paul, Ben,
> >
> > Today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc44x_config) failed like this:
> >
> > arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c: In function 'kvm_arch_vcpu_put':
> > arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c:333: error: implicit declaration of function
> > '_tlbil_all'
> >
> > Probably caused by commit 2a4aca1144394653269720ffbb5a325a77abd5fa
> > ("powerpc/mm: Split low level tlb invalidate for nohash processors").
> > Reverting just that commit was too difficult, so I have reverted the
> > powerpc tree for today.
>
> You can't revert that without reverting my whole series.I know that ... I tried. > Adding a #include ../mm/mmu_decl.h to the kvm code should fix it for > now. > > I need to talk to hollis about the right way to do that stuff in > the long run but it might be it... those _tlbil things are low level > stuff that aren't supposed to be used by the outside world which is > why I moved the declarations there, but KVM is also low level :-) So, why is this series in powerpc/next at all if some of the modified files haven't even been compiled? A simple ppc44x_defconfig build of the powerpc/next tree fails - which I would have thought would be part of the testing since KVM is only implemented for 44x on powerpc. (Sorry, I am annoyed - it was late when I finally found this build failure on top of everything else.) -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
pgpgYAgMCzv7X.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
