On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 07:44:56 +1100 Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-11-12 at 09:11 -0600, Hollis Blanchard wrote: > > Forget pages. The errata is about the last 256 bytes of physical > > memory. > > > > > I still find it a bit tricky to have memory nodes not aligned on > > nice > > > fat big boundaries tho. > > > > I don't know what you're referring to. The patch I sent doesn't touch > > memory nodes, so they are indeed still aligned on nice fat big > > boundaries. > > My last comment was about the approach of modifying the memory node. > > > I don't think this is overengineering at all. We can't touch the last > > 256 bytes, so we mark it reserved, and then we won't. Altering memory > > nodes is far more complicated and error-prone. > > But your approach is going to be painful for kexec which will have to > duplicate that logic. > > Again, why can't we just stick something in the kernel code that > reserves the last page ? It could be in prom.c or it could be called by > affected 4xx platforms by the platform code, whatever, but the reserve > map isn't really meant for that and will not be passed over from kernel > to kernel by kexec. Again, because newer U-Boot is doing the fixup on memsize for us already. This is why it was done in the wrapper to begin with, since it depends on the version of U-Boot that you happen to be using. If you have a good idea on how to figure that out in-kernel, do the fixup when needed, and not make people's eyes bleed, I'm all for it. josh _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
