On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 09:58:44AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
[...]
>>> is the plan to connect ppc_md.machine_shutdown() with this?
>>
>> You mean poweroff? It's already connected.
>>
>> + /* XXX: this is potentially racy, but there is no lock for
>> ppc_md */
>> + if (!ppc_md.power_off) {
>> + glob_mcu = mcu;
>> + ppc_md.power_off = mcu_power_off;
>> + dev_info(&client->dev, "will provide power-off
>> service\n");
>> + }
>
>
> uuh, yeah.. poweroff :)
>
> and look at that. Is this in Jean's queue?
Nope. Here's what Jean wrote:
On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 01:22:48PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> I do not have the time to review these patches (and, honestly, have no
> interest in them.) So I will not merge them but I have no objection to
> them being merged by somebody else.
So.. I think it could easily go through the powerpc tree.
--
Anton Vorontsov
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
