On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 11:45:40PM +0100, Ben Dooks wrote: > I've also a driver for a similar PMU fitted to a number > of our boards that provides basic gpio (wakeup sources) and some > minimalist power management (so isn't really fit for regulator > framwork) and isn't really a gpio chip (so drivers/gpio isn't > really the place for it either.)
FWIW the regulator framework does have support for representing things as limited as completely non-controllable regulators so it may still be worth considering that. It at least provides a degree of abstraction for the clients in case they are used with more complex regulators and would allow integration of your PMU with more complex secondary regulators. May not be worth the bother, though. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
