On 08/09/2025 18:56, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2025 at 08:39:24AM +0100, Kevin Brodsky wrote:
>> When the lazy MMU mode was introduced eons ago, it wasn't made clear
>> whether such a sequence was legal:
>>
>> arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode()
>> ...
>> arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode()
>> ...
>> arch_leave_lazy_mmu_mode()
>> ...
>> arch_leave_lazy_mmu_mode()
>>
>> It seems fair to say that nested calls to
>> arch_{enter,leave}_lazy_mmu_mode() were not expected, and most
>> architectures never explicitly supported it.
>
> This is compiling with CONFIG_USERFAULTFD at all commits and series is
> compiling with allmodconfig plus all mm selftests are passing so from my
> side this looks good, thanks for addressing issues and rebasing! :)
Great thank you for that extensive testing, very appreciated! Shall I
add your Reviewed-by to the whole series?
- Kevin
