On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 01:38:24PM +0800, Wei Fang wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h 
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h
> index a3ce324c716c..ecf79338cd79 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h
> @@ -543,6 +543,8 @@ void enetc_set_rss_key(struct enetc_si *si, const u8 
> *bytes);
>  int enetc_get_rss_table(struct enetc_si *si, u32 *table, int count);
>  int enetc_set_rss_table(struct enetc_si *si, const u32 *table, int count);
>  int enetc_send_cmd(struct enetc_si *si, struct enetc_cbd *cbd);
> +int enetc4_get_rss_table(struct enetc_si *si, u32 *table, int count);
> +int enetc4_set_rss_table(struct enetc_si *si, const u32 *table, int count);
>  
>  static inline void *enetc_cbd_alloc_data_mem(struct enetc_si *si,
>                                            struct enetc_cbd *cbd,
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc4_pf.c 
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc4_pf.c
> index f991e1aae85c..53dbd5d71859 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc4_pf.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc4_pf.c
> @@ -693,6 +693,14 @@ static void enetc4_pf_set_rx_mode(struct net_device 
> *ndev)
>       queue_work(si->workqueue, &si->rx_mode_task);
>  }
>  
> +static int enetc4_pf_set_features(struct net_device *ndev,
> +                               netdev_features_t features)
> +{
> +     enetc_set_features(ndev, features);
> +
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static const struct net_device_ops enetc4_ndev_ops = {
>       .ndo_open               = enetc_open,
>       .ndo_stop               = enetc_close,
> @@ -700,6 +708,7 @@ static const struct net_device_ops enetc4_ndev_ops = {
>       .ndo_get_stats          = enetc_get_stats,
>       .ndo_set_mac_address    = enetc_pf_set_mac_addr,
>       .ndo_set_rx_mode        = enetc4_pf_set_rx_mode,
> +     .ndo_set_features       = enetc4_pf_set_features,
>  };
>  
>  static struct phylink_pcs *
> @@ -1108,6 +1117,8 @@ static void enetc4_pf_netdev_destroy(struct enetc_si 
> *si)
>  static const struct enetc_si_ops enetc4_psi_ops = {
>       .setup_cbdr = enetc4_setup_cbdr,
>       .teardown_cbdr = enetc4_teardown_cbdr,
> +     .get_rss_table = enetc4_get_rss_table,
> +     .set_rss_table = enetc4_set_rss_table,
>  };
>  
>  static int enetc4_pf_wq_task_init(struct enetc_si *si)
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_cbdr.c 
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_cbdr.c
> index 4e5125331d7b..1a74b93f1fd3 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_cbdr.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_cbdr.c
> @@ -299,3 +299,17 @@ int enetc_set_rss_table(struct enetc_si *si, const u32 
> *table, int count)
>       return enetc_cmd_rss_table(si, (u32 *)table, count, false);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enetc_set_rss_table);
> +
> +int enetc4_get_rss_table(struct enetc_si *si, u32 *table, int count)
> +{
> +     return ntmp_rsst_query_or_update_entry(&si->ntmp.cbdrs,
> +                                            table, count, true);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enetc4_get_rss_table);
> +
> +int enetc4_set_rss_table(struct enetc_si *si, const u32 *table, int count)
> +{
> +     return ntmp_rsst_query_or_update_entry(&si->ntmp.cbdrs,
> +                                            (u32 *)table, count, false);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enetc4_set_rss_table);

I don't understand the logic for placing enetc4_get_rss_table() and
enetc4_set_rss_table() in enetc_cbdr.c (built as part of fsl-enetc-core-y)?
It's not core code, it's used only by NETC v4.

> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_ethtool.c 
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_ethtool.c
> index 1a8fae3c406b..bc65135925b8 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_ethtool.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_ethtool.c
> @@ -625,6 +625,24 @@ static int enetc_get_rxnfc(struct net_device *ndev, 
> struct ethtool_rxnfc *rxnfc,
>       return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static int enetc4_get_rxnfc(struct net_device *ndev, struct ethtool_rxnfc 
> *rxnfc,
> +                         u32 *rule_locs)
> +{
> +     struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> +
> +     switch (rxnfc->cmd) {
> +     case ETHTOOL_GRXRINGS:
> +             rxnfc->data = priv->num_rx_rings;
> +             break;
> +     case ETHTOOL_GRXFH:
> +             return enetc_get_rsshash(rxnfc);

These rxnfc commands seem implemented identically to the corresponding
subset from enetc_get_rxnfc(). Rather than duplicating those, could you
rather return -EOPNOTSUPP for the unsupported ones on NETC v4, and reuse
enetc_get_rxnfc()?

> +     default:
> +             return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +     }
> +
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int enetc_set_rxnfc(struct net_device *ndev, struct ethtool_rxnfc 
> *rxnfc)
>  {
>       struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> @@ -685,22 +703,29 @@ static int enetc_get_rss_key_base(struct enetc_si *si)
>       return ENETC4_PRSSKR(0);
>  }
>  
> +static void enetc_get_rss_key(struct enetc_si *si, const u8 *key)
> +{
> +     int base = enetc_get_rss_key_base(si);
> +     struct enetc_hw *hw = &si->hw;
> +     int i;
> +
> +     for (i = 0; i < ENETC_RSSHASH_KEY_SIZE / 4; i++)
> +             ((u32 *)key)[i] = enetc_port_rd(hw, base + i * 4);
> +}

I would have expected that this refactoring of code into
enetc_get_rss_key() would be done as part of the previous change:
"net: enetc: make enetc_set_rss_key() reusable".

> +
>  static int enetc_get_rxfh(struct net_device *ndev,
>                         struct ethtool_rxfh_param *rxfh)
>  {
>       struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
>       struct enetc_si *si = priv->si;
> -     struct enetc_hw *hw = &si->hw;
> -     int err = 0, i;
> +     int err = 0;
>  
>       /* return hash function */
>       rxfh->hfunc = ETH_RSS_HASH_TOP;
>  
>       /* return hash key */
> -     if (rxfh->key && hw->port)
> -             for (i = 0; i < ENETC_RSSHASH_KEY_SIZE / 4; i++)
> -                     ((u32 *)rxfh->key)[i] = enetc_port_rd(hw,
> -                                                           ENETC_PRSSK(i));
> +     if (rxfh->key && enetc_si_is_pf(si))
> +             enetc_get_rss_key(si, rxfh->key);
>  
>       /* return RSS table */
>       if (rxfh->indir)
> @@ -1249,6 +1274,11 @@ const struct ethtool_ops enetc4_pf_ethtool_ops = {
>       .set_wol = enetc_set_wol,
>       .get_pauseparam = enetc_get_pauseparam,
>       .set_pauseparam = enetc_set_pauseparam,
> +     .get_rxnfc = enetc4_get_rxnfc,
> +     .get_rxfh_key_size = enetc_get_rxfh_key_size,
> +     .get_rxfh_indir_size = enetc_get_rxfh_indir_size,
> +     .get_rxfh = enetc_get_rxfh,
> +     .set_rxfh = enetc_set_rxfh,
>  };
>  
>  void enetc_set_ethtool_ops(struct net_device *ndev)

Reply via email to