On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 09:03:34AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 04:42:55PM +0800, pet...@redhat.com wrote: > > From: Peter Xu <pet...@redhat.com> > > > > pud_leaf() has a fallback macro defined in include/linux/pgtable.h already. > > Drop the extra two for x86. > > > > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> > > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mi...@redhat.com> > > Cc: Borislav Petkov <b...@alien8.de> > > Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.han...@linux.intel.com> > > Cc: x...@kernel.org > > Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <pet...@redhat.com> > > --- > > arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h | 1 - > > include/asm-generic/pgtable-nopmd.h | 1 - > > 2 files changed, 2 deletions(-) > > Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <j...@nvidia.com> > > > @@ -31,7 +31,6 @@ static inline int pud_none(pud_t pud) { > > return 0; } > > static inline int pud_bad(pud_t pud) { return 0; } > > static inline int pud_present(pud_t pud) { return 1; } > > static inline int pud_user(pud_t pud) { return 0; } > > -static inline int pud_leaf(pud_t pud) { return 0; } > > It would be nice to have a final patch making the signatures > consistent on all the arch inlines, it should return bool not int.
Makes sense, will do, thanks. -- Peter Xu