On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 04:42:55PM +0800, pet...@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Peter Xu <pet...@redhat.com>
>
> pud_leaf() has a fallback macro defined in include/linux/pgtable.h already.
> Drop the extra two for x86.
>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mi...@redhat.com>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <b...@alien8.de>
> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.han...@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: x...@kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <pet...@redhat.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h | 1 -
> include/asm-generic/pgtable-nopmd.h | 1 -
> 2 files changed, 2 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <j...@nvidia.com>
> @@ -31,7 +31,6 @@ static inline int pud_none(pud_t pud) {
> return 0; }
> static inline int pud_bad(pud_t pud) { return 0; }
> static inline int pud_present(pud_t pud) { return 1; }
> static inline int pud_user(pud_t pud) { return 0; }
> -static inline int pud_leaf(pud_t pud) { return 0; }
It would be nice to have a final patch making the signatures
consistent on all the arch inlines, it should return bool not int.
Jason
