Christophe Leroy <christophe.le...@csgroup.eu> writes: > Le 25/01/2024 à 17:33, Nathan Lynch a écrit : >> Christophe Leroy <christophe.le...@csgroup.eu> writes: >>> Hi Nathan, >>> >>> Le 06/03/2023 à 22:33, Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay a écrit : >>>> From: Nathan Lynch <nath...@linux.ibm.com> >>>> >>>> The kernel can handle retrying RTAS function calls in response to >>>> -2/990x in the sys_rtas() handler instead of relaying the intermediate >>>> status to user space. >>> >>> From this series with still have patches 5, 7 and 8 awaiting in >>> patchwork, see >>> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/list/?submitter=85747 >>> and patch 8 doesn't apply anymore. >>> >>> Are those 3 patches still relevant or should they be discarded ? >> >> Thanks for checking - 5 and 7 can be discarded. >> >> I intend to return to 8/8 ("consume retry statuses...") when time >> allows. So that could be put in "changes requested" state I suppose, but >> if it's easier on the maintainer side to discard it that's fine with me >> too. > > Ok, thanks for answering, I rejected 5 and 7 and requested changes to 8. > > While at it, what about patch 2 of series > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/list/?series=382195&state=*
Drop it, thanks.
