Le 25/01/2024 à 17:33, Nathan Lynch a écrit : > Christophe Leroy <christophe.le...@csgroup.eu> writes: >> Hi Nathan, >> >> Le 06/03/2023 à 22:33, Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay a écrit : >>> From: Nathan Lynch <nath...@linux.ibm.com> >>> >>> The kernel can handle retrying RTAS function calls in response to >>> -2/990x in the sys_rtas() handler instead of relaying the intermediate >>> status to user space. >> >> From this series with still have patches 5, 7 and 8 awaiting in >> patchwork, see >> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/list/?submitter=85747 >> and patch 8 doesn't apply anymore. >> >> Are those 3 patches still relevant or should they be discarded ? > > Thanks for checking - 5 and 7 can be discarded. > > I intend to return to 8/8 ("consume retry statuses...") when time > allows. So that could be put in "changes requested" state I suppose, but > if it's easier on the maintainer side to discard it that's fine with me > too.
Ok, thanks for answering, I rejected 5 and 7 and requested changes to 8. While at it, what about patch 2 of series https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/list/?series=382195&state=* Christophe
