On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 02:12:20PM -0700, Trent Piepho wrote: > On Mon, 21 Jul 2008, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 02:08:01PM -0700, Trent Piepho wrote: > >> It doesn't look like you have any way to unset the active low flag. What > >> if > >> I unload the leds-gpio driver (or another gpio user) and then try to use > >> the > >> gpio with something else? The active low flag is stuck on! > > > > Why would you want to unset the flags? It is specified in the device > > tree, and can't be changed. Specifying different flags for the same GPIO > > would be an error (plus, Linux forbids shared gpios, so you simply can't > > specify one gpio for several devices). > > You can't use the same gpio for two different things at the same time, but you > can load a driver, unload it, and then load another.
Hm.. yeah, this might happen. Now I tend to think that transparent active-low handling wasn't that good idea after all. So, something like of_gpio_is_active_low(device_node, gpioidx) should be implemented instead. This function will parse the gpio's = <> flags. Please speak up if you have any better ideas though. Thanks for bringing this up, -- Anton Vorontsov email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2 _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev