On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 11:28:36 -0700 "Mike Mason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This patch changes the EEH_MAX_FAILS action from panic to printing an > error message. Panicking under under this condition is too harsh. > Although performance will be affected and the device may not recover, > the system is still running, which at the very least, should allow > for a more graceful shutdown. The panic() is now wrapped in a DEBUG > statement for development purposes. The patch also removes the > msleep() within a spinlock, which is not allowed. Why can you not msleep within a spinlock? And when was this change brought in? Cheers, Sean _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
