Arnd Bergmann wrote: > Seeing more hits in handle_mm_fault suggests that you have > a higher page fault rate. A trivial reason for this might > be that the amount of memory was misdetected in the new > code (maybe broken device tree). What is the content of > /proc/meminfo after a fresh boot?
I also just realized that the /aprch/ppc was set up without high-mem support (using all 1G as lowmem), while the arch/powerpc was set up with hightmem. I'm retrying a compile without highmem support and 1 G lowmem on arch/powerpc now to see if it makes a difference. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
