Andrew Donnellan <a...@linux.ibm.com> writes: > On Mon, 2023-03-06 at 15:33 -0600, Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay wrote: >> * We can expect performance improvements for existing sys_rtas() >> users, not only because of overall reduction in the number of >> system >> calls issued, but also due to the better handling of -2/990x in the >> kernel. For example, librtas still sleeps for 1ms on -2, which is >> completely unnecessary. > > Would be good to see this fixed on the librtas side.
Filed an issue: https://github.com/ibm-power-utilities/librtas/issues/30
