----- Original Message -----
> From: "Alex Williamson" <alex.william...@redhat.com>
> To: "Timothy Pearson" <tpear...@raptorengineering.com>
> Cc: "kvm" <k...@vger.kernel.org>, "linuxppc-dev"
> <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
> Sent: Monday, March 6, 2023 5:46:07 PM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Reenable VFIO support on POWER systems
> On Mon, 6 Mar 2023 11:29:53 -0600 (CST)
> Timothy Pearson <tpear...@raptorengineering.com> wrote:
>
>> This patch series reenables VFIO support on POWER systems. It
>> is based on Alexey Kardashevskiys's patch series, rebased and
>> successfully tested under QEMU with a Marvell PCIe SATA controller
>> on a POWER9 Blackbird host.
>>
>> Alexey Kardashevskiy (3):
>> powerpc/iommu: Add "borrowing" iommu_table_group_ops
>> powerpc/pci_64: Init pcibios subsys a bit later
>> powerpc/iommu: Add iommu_ops to report capabilities and allow blocking
>> domains
>>
>> Timothy Pearson (1):
>> Add myself to MAINTAINERS for Power VFIO support
>>
>> MAINTAINERS | 5 +
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/iommu.h | 6 +-
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h | 7 +
>> arch/powerpc/kernel/iommu.c | 246 +++++++++++++++++++++-
>> arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_64.c | 2 +-
>> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c | 36 +++-
>> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c | 27 +++
>> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/pseries.h | 4 +
>> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c | 3 +
>> drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c | 96 ++-------
>> 10 files changed, 338 insertions(+), 94 deletions(-)
>>
>
> For vfio and MAINTAINERS portions,
>
> Acked-by: Alex Williamson <alex.william...@redhat.com>
>
> I'll note though that spapr_tce_take_ownership() looks like it copied a
> bug from the old tce_iommu_take_ownership() where tbl and tbl->it_map
> are tested before calling iommu_take_ownership() but not in the unwind
> loop, ie. tables we might have skipped on setup are unconditionally
> released on unwind. Thanks,
>
> Alex
Thanks for that. I'll put together a patch to get rid of that potential bug
that can be applied after this series is merged, unless you'd rather I resubmit
a v3 with the issue fixed?