Hi Sathvika, > > Just one question though. Went through the code again and I think > that this place shouldn't be proper to insert a SYM_FUNC_END > because we haven't entered the guest at this point and the name > of the function is kvmppc_hv_entry which I think implies that > this SYM_FUNC_END should be at some place after the HRFI_TO_GUEST. > > What do you think ? Any updates on this ? Is there any other way to avoid this warning ?
- [PATCH 0/2] Improving calls to kvmppc_hv_entry Kautuk Consul
- [PATCH 1/2] arch/powerpc/kvm: kvmppc_hv_entry: rem... Kautuk Consul
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] arch/powerpc/kvm: kvmppc_hv_en... Sathvika Vasireddy
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] arch/powerpc/kvm: kvmppc_h... Kautuk Consul
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] arch/powerpc/kvm: kvmp... Sathvika Vasireddy
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] arch/powerpc/kvm:... Kautuk Consul
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] arch/powerpc/... Kautuk Consul
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] arch/powe... Kautuk Consul
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] arch/powe... Sathvika Vasireddy
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] arch/powe... Kautuk Consul
- [PATCH 2/2] arch/powerpc/kvm: kvmppc_hv_entry: rem... Kautuk Consul
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] arch/powerpc/kvm: kvmppc_hv_en... Kautuk Consul