> >> I'd have preferred with 'asm volatile' though. > > Sorry about that! That wasn't the intent of this patch. > > Probably another patch series should change this manner of #defining > > assembly. > > Why adding new line wrong then have to have another patch to make them > right ? > > When you build a new house in an old village, you first build your house > with old materials and then you replace everything with new material ? Sorry Christophe. I will take care next time to adhere to new conventions.
- [PATCH v2] arch/powerpc/include/asm/barrier.h: redefine r... Kautuk Consul
- Re: [PATCH v2] arch/powerpc/include/asm/barrier.h: r... Kautuk Consul
- Re: [PATCH v2] arch/powerpc/include/asm/barrier.... Christophe Leroy
- Re: [PATCH v2] arch/powerpc/include/asm/barr... Kautuk Consul
- Re: [PATCH v2] arch/powerpc/include/asm/barrier.h: r... Christophe Leroy
- Re: [PATCH v2] arch/powerpc/include/asm/barrier.... Kautuk Consul
- Re: [PATCH v2] arch/powerpc/include/asm/barr... Christophe Leroy
- Re: [PATCH v2] arch/powerpc/include/asm/... Kautuk Consul
- Re: [PATCH v2] arch/powerpc/include/asm/barrier.h: r... Paul E. McKenney
- Re: [PATCH v2] arch/powerpc/include/asm/barrier.... Michael Ellerman
- Re: [PATCH v2] arch/powerpc/include/asm/barr... Kautuk Consul
- Re: [PATCH v2] arch/powerpc/include/asm/barr... Kautuk Consul
- Re: [PATCH v2] arch/powerpc/include/asm/... Michael Ellerman
- Re: [PATCH v2] arch/powerpc/include/asm/barrier.... Kautuk Consul
- Re: [PATCH v2] arch/powerpc/include/asm/barr... Paul E. McKenney
- Re: [PATCH v2] arch/powerpc/include/asm/... Kautuk Consul