> On 06-Oct-2022, at 7:33 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <a...@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> Em Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 06:16:14PM +0530, Athira Rajeev escreveu:
>> 
>> 
>>> On 05-Oct-2022, at 6:05 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <a...@kernel.org> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Em Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 09:28:52AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
>>>> Em Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 10:23:39AM +0530, Athira Rajeev escreveu:
>>>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/stat-display.c 
>>>>> b/tools/perf/util/stat-display.c
>>>>> index b82844cb0ce7..cf28020798ec 100644
>>>>> --- a/tools/perf/util/stat-display.c
>>>>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/stat-display.c
>>>>> @@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ static void aggr_printout(struct perf_stat_config 
>>>>> *config,
>>>>>                                   id.socket,
>>>>>                                   id.die,
>>>>>                                   id.core);
>>>>> -                 } else if (id.core > -1) {
>>>>> +                 } else if (id.cpu.cpu > -1) {
>>>>>                           fprintf(config->output, "\"cpu\" : \"%d\", ",
>>>>>                                   id.cpu.cpu);
>>>>>                   }
>>>>> @@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ static void aggr_printout(struct perf_stat_config 
>>>>> *config,
>>>>>                                   id.die,
>>>>>                                   config->csv_output ? 0 : -3,
>>>>>                                   id.core, config->csv_sep);
>>>>> -                 } else if (id.core > -1) {
>>>>> +                 } else if (id.cpu.cpu > -1) {
>>>>>                           fprintf(config->output, "CPU%*d%s",
>>>>>                                   config->csv_output ? 0 : -7,
>>>>>                                   id.cpu.cpu, config->csv_sep);
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> If it is confusing, shall I send it as a separate patch along with 
>>>>> Tested-by from Ian ?
>>>> 
>>>> I'll have to do this by hand, tried pointing b4 to this message and it
>>>> picked the old one, also tried to save the message and apply by hand,
>>>> its mangled.
>>> 
>>> This is what I have now, will force push later, please triple check :-)
>> 
>> 
>> Sorry for all the confusion Arnaldo. Hereafter, I will resubmit the patch to 
>> avoid this.
>> In below patch which you shared, code change is correct. But commit message 
>> is different.
>> So to avoid further confusion, I went ahead and posted a separate patch in 
>> the mailing list with:
>> 
>> subject: [PATCH] tools/perf: Fix cpu check to use id.cpu.cpu in aggr_printout
>> Patch link: 
>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221006114225.66303-1-atraj...@linux.vnet.ibm.com/T/#u
>> 
>> Please pick the separately send patch.
> 
> Ok, will do.

Thanks Arnaldo.
> 
> - Arnaldo

Reply via email to