Em Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 06:16:14PM +0530, Athira Rajeev escreveu:
> 
> 
> > On 05-Oct-2022, at 6:05 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <a...@kernel.org> 
> > wrote:
> > 
> > Em Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 09:28:52AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> >> Em Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 10:23:39AM +0530, Athira Rajeev escreveu:
> >>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/stat-display.c 
> >>> b/tools/perf/util/stat-display.c
> >>> index b82844cb0ce7..cf28020798ec 100644
> >>> --- a/tools/perf/util/stat-display.c
> >>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/stat-display.c
> >>> @@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ static void aggr_printout(struct perf_stat_config 
> >>> *config,
> >>>                                   id.socket,
> >>>                                   id.die,
> >>>                                   id.core);
> >>> -                 } else if (id.core > -1) {
> >>> +                 } else if (id.cpu.cpu > -1) {
> >>>                           fprintf(config->output, "\"cpu\" : \"%d\", ",
> >>>                                   id.cpu.cpu);
> >>>                   }
> >>> @@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ static void aggr_printout(struct perf_stat_config 
> >>> *config,
> >>>                                   id.die,
> >>>                                   config->csv_output ? 0 : -3,
> >>>                                   id.core, config->csv_sep);
> >>> -                 } else if (id.core > -1) {
> >>> +                 } else if (id.cpu.cpu > -1) {
> >>>                           fprintf(config->output, "CPU%*d%s",
> >>>                                   config->csv_output ? 0 : -7,
> >>>                                   id.cpu.cpu, config->csv_sep);
> >>> -- 
> >>> If it is confusing, shall I send it as a separate patch along with 
> >>> Tested-by from Ian ?
> >> 
> >> I'll have to do this by hand, tried pointing b4 to this message and it
> >> picked the old one, also tried to save the message and apply by hand,
> >> its mangled.
> > 
> > This is what I have now, will force push later, please triple check :-)
> 
> 
> Sorry for all the confusion Arnaldo. Hereafter, I will resubmit the patch to 
> avoid this.
> In below patch which you shared, code change is correct. But commit message 
> is different.
> So to avoid further confusion, I went ahead and posted a separate patch in 
> the mailing list with:
> 
> subject: [PATCH] tools/perf: Fix cpu check to use id.cpu.cpu in aggr_printout
> Patch link: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221006114225.66303-1-atraj...@linux.vnet.ibm.com/T/#u
> 
> Please pick the separately send patch.

Ok, will do.

- Arnaldo

Reply via email to