On Thursday 26 June 2008, Sean MacLennan wrote: > > Well, there's a lot of disagreement on this subject. Not only do we > > not agree on a method of enumerating devices, a lot of people have a > > problem with the concept of enumerating them in the first place! > > An interesting point is that I enforced an index in the i2c-ibm_iic > driver with no disagreement at all ;)
You have been lucky I suppose. :) I could easily just have used this existing "index" property for the other 4xx boards, but expected NAK's for this. That and because FSL uses "cell-index" is why I asked prior to sending patches. Now I have no idea how to support I2C on the other 4xx boards. Perhaps Josh could advise how this should be done? Best regards, Stefan _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
