On Mon, 21 Jun 2021 at 19:32, Sachin Sant <sach...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > >>> Any thoughts Vincent? > >> > >> > >> I would prefer that we use the reason of adding the cfs in the list > >> instead. > >> > >> Something like the below should also fixed the problem. It is based on a > >> proposal I made to Rik sometimes ago when he tried to flatten the rq: > >> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190906191237.27006-6-r...@surriel.com/ > >> > >> This will ensure that a cfs is added in the list whenever one of its child > >> is still in the list. > > > > Could you confirm that this patch fixes the problem for you too ? > > > Thanks for the fix. > > The patch fixes the reported problem. The test ran to completion without > any failure. > > Reported-by: Sachin Sant <sach...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sach...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Thanks > > -Sachin >
