>>> Any thoughts Vincent? >> >> >> I would prefer that we use the reason of adding the cfs in the list instead. >> >> Something like the below should also fixed the problem. It is based on a >> proposal I made to Rik sometimes ago when he tried to flatten the rq: >> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190906191237.27006-6-r...@surriel.com/ >> >> This will ensure that a cfs is added in the list whenever one of its child >> is still in the list. > > Could you confirm that this patch fixes the problem for you too ? > Thanks for the fix.
The patch fixes the reported problem. The test ran to completion without any failure. Reported-by: Sachin Sant <sach...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sach...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> -Sachin
