On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 1:20 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 21 May 2008, Grant Likely wrote: > >> If some behaviour is entirely board specific and doesn't have any >> possibility of being duplicated on other boards, then it makes sense >> for the code implementing that behaviour to live with the platform >> code. > > Exactly - "entirely board specific" and "doesn't have any possibility of > being duplicated on other boards." > >> > What good is an OF-binding if it doesn't provide complete information? >> >> It still increases the amount of common code even if there are rare >> corner cases that require board specific code. > > Right again - _rare_ corner cases. Whereas we are talking about _all_ SPI > busses, maybe apart from those, where the controller itself switches CSs > in a well-defined way, and the driver doesn't need any additional > information to handle this.
Ah, I see where we are crossing our wires. I was talking about the case of registering spi devices. I agree that the spi bus should not need any additional information. Cheers, g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
