On Wed, 21 May 2008, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 05:56:33PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > > > Hm, I might well misunderstand something here, but it looks to me like you > > are again trying to use both OF _and_ platform (spi_board_info) bindings > > for your SPI setup? > > Yes, you didn't misunderstand. ;-) > > > And this is exactly what we are trying to avoid in > > Grant's series of patches... > > I didn't find other way... The show stopper is "master" argument, > drivers don't know about masters (and should not, since if they should, > then this implies that masters should be registered prior to devices, > and that complicates everything). > > What is the problem with board infos, btw? I missed that part. Board
In short: board infos are not bad as such. I find it bad if you have to use both OF and platform bindings to describe _one_ piece of hardware. For more details you might want to re-read the thread, so, we don't have to discuss the same issues again. Thanks Guennadi --- Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D. Freelance Open-Source Software Developer _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
