On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 09:50:27AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Anton, > > This is not me picking on you, I just want to make a general statement. > > On Thu, 15 May 2008 20:20:48 +0400 Anton Vorontsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Could we then apply this to the powerpc-next for proper testing? > > We should not do this. powerpc-next feeds into linux-next which is for > inter subsystem integration testing. Architecture specific testing > should be done before things get to -next.
Oh. > I am hoping that Paul will run a separate powerpc tree/branch for powerpc > wide testing and then migrate stuff form there to powerpc-next when he is > happy that things are as good as we can get. This does not mean > "perfect". :-) Yeah, that would be great. Thanks, -- Anton Vorontsov email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2 _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
