Hi Anton, This is not me picking on you, I just want to make a general statement.
On Thu, 15 May 2008 20:20:48 +0400 Anton Vorontsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Could we then apply this to the powerpc-next for proper testing? We should not do this. powerpc-next feeds into linux-next which is for inter subsystem integration testing. Architecture specific testing should be done before things get to -next. I am hoping that Paul will run a separate powerpc tree/branch for powerpc wide testing and then migrate stuff form there to powerpc-next when he is happy that things are as good as we can get. This does not mean "perfect". :-) -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
pgpIlepdVrCf0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
