From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 23:51:29 -0700
> > > Paul, any thoughts here ? Should we add a lock ? That would mean being > > careful as the LMB stuff can be called very early, and spinlock wants > > things like PACA and possibly lockdep to be around.. > > Actually, we call early_init_devtree(), which populates the LMB, after > we initialize the PACA and lockdep, so it -should- be safe to add a > spinlock. > > Dave ? Any objection to adding a spinlock to the LMB code ? No objections, just don't add any bugs. :-) _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
