> So it looks like we need to define a new feature bit to mean "supports > block-step". Is this something that userspace will expect to be told > about via the AT_HWCAP entry in the aux vector?
I don't care to have userland know about it. I'm just concerned with the arch_has_block_step() definition being right. But, you did previously tell me that userland can set its own MSR_SE via sigreturn or setcontext or something. If it can set its own MSR_BE the same way, then perhaps userland wants to know. Thanks, Roland _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
