On Sun, 2008-05-04 at 16:12 -0700, Roland McGrath wrote: > > Oh and classic pitfall: If you define a new feature bit, make sure > > CPU_FTRS_POSSIBLE is updated to contain it in cputable.h > > Yeah, all that stuff I could figure out as needed. What I really meant > was, where is the big official table of which chips behave which ways that > you base all code that on?
There isn't any ... > Actually, I don't really care as long as you > all are happy to be responsible for figuring out what matters. With the > patch I posted to use MSR_BE, I took Kumar Gala's word as gospel that all > the chips on which we use MSR_SE also have MSR_BE. If that's not right, > then I hope you'd like to pick a feature bit, populate the tables, etc., > and fix the definition of arch_has_block_step() as appropriate. I'll have to check with Paul, we'll scrub the IBM parts, and Kumar can dbl check the "classic 32" FSL parts. Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
