On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 05:55:30PM -0300, Murilo Opsfelder Araújo wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/init_64.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/init_64.c
> > index bc73abf0bc25..152aa0200cef 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/init_64.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/init_64.c
> > @@ -407,12 +407,15 @@ static void __init early_check_vec5(void)
> > if (!(vec5[OV5_INDX(OV5_RADIX_GTSE)] &
> > OV5_FEAT(OV5_RADIX_GTSE))) {
> > pr_warn("WARNING: Hypervisor doesn't support RADIX with
> > GTSE\n");
> > - }
> > + cur_cpu_spec->mmu_features &= ~MMU_FTR_GTSE;
> > + } else
> > + cur_cpu_spec->mmu_features |= MMU_FTR_GTSE;
> > /* Do radix anyway - the hypervisor said we had to */
> > cur_cpu_spec->mmu_features |= MMU_FTR_TYPE_RADIX;
> > } else if (mmu_supported == OV5_FEAT(OV5_MMU_HASH)) {
> > /* Hypervisor only supports hash - disable radix */
> > cur_cpu_spec->mmu_features &= ~MMU_FTR_TYPE_RADIX;
> > + cur_cpu_spec->mmu_features &= ~MMU_FTR_GTSE;
> > }
> > }
>
> Is this a part of the code where mmu_clear_feature() cannot be used?
Yes, it appears so. Jump label initialization isn't done yet.
Regards,
Bharata.
