On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 11:01:47PM +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > >>3. The style in all the assembly code is not to have spaces after > >>commas separating instruction operands. > > > >I'll do that if that's what is prefered, but how did that come about as > >the style used? It's different from what we do in C, > > But this isn't C code, it's assembler code.
Enh. It's a comma-delineated list in both cases. > PowerPC assembler code (and most other assembler code) doesn't use > spaces here usually. Looking at other arches, it seems pretty evenly split. > >and adding the space helps readability in asm as well... > > Many people disagree ;-) Compressionhelpsreadability? > Anyway, it's better to keep a consistent style, whatever that style > is, don't you agree? Not if it's GNU-style. :-) -Scott _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
