On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 02:57:24PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > is there any specific reason, why out of these 7 patches only the first > one made it into the mainline? AFAICS, there has been only one comment, > suggesting to replace printk with dev_err on two occasions in one of > the patches...
A while ago Paul said on IRC he'd prefer to do the TLF_SLEEPING hack more like the soft IRQ disabling that 64-bit uses. I haven't yet had a chance to look into it, so the patch collects dust, despite the current implementation of TLF_SLEEPING working just fine. -Scott _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
