>> On Thu, 2020-04-16 at 08:35 -0700, Wang Wenhu wrote:
>> > +#define UIO_INFO_VER "devicetree,pseudo"
>>
>> What does this mean? Changing a number into a non-obvious string (Why
>> "pseudo"? Why does the UIO user care that the config came from the device
>> tree?) just to avoid setting off Greg's version number autoresponse isn't
>> really helping anything.
>>
>> > +static const struct of_device_id uio_mpc85xx_l2ctlr_of_match[] = {
>> > + { .compatible = "uio,mpc85xx-cache-sram", },
>
>Form is <vendor>,<device> and "uio" is not a vendor (and never will be).
>
Should have been something like "fsl,mpc85xx-cache-sram-uio", and if it is
to be defined with module parameters, this would be user defined.
Anyway, <vendor>,<device> should always be used.
>> > + {},
>> > +};
>> > +
>> > +static struct platform_driver uio_fsl_85xx_cache_sram = {
>> > + .probe = uio_fsl_85xx_cache_sram_probe,
>> > + .remove = uio_fsl_85xx_cache_sram_remove,
>> > + .driver = {
>> > + .name = DRIVER_NAME,
>> > + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>> > + .of_match_table = uio_mpc85xx_l2ctlr_of_match,
>> > + },
>> > +};
>>
>> Greg's comment notwithstanding, I really don't think this belongs in the
>> device tree (and if I do get overruled on that point, it at least needs a
>> binding document). Let me try to come up with a patch for dynamic
>> allocation.
>
>Agreed. "UIO" bindings have long been rejected.
>
Sounds it is. And does the modification below fit well?
---
-static const struct of_device_id uio_mpc85xx_l2ctlr_of_match[] = {
- { .compatible = "uio,mpc85xx-cache-sram", },
- {},
+#ifdef CONFIG_OF
+static struct of_device_id uio_fsl_85xx_cache_sram_of_match[] = {
+ { /* This is filled with module_parm */ },
+ { /* Sentinel */ },
};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, uio_fsl_85xx_cache_sram_of_match);
+module_param_string(of_id, uio_fsl_85xx_cache_sram_of_match[0].compatible,
+
sizeof(uio_fsl_85xx_cache_sram_of_match[0].compatible), 0);
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(of_id, "platform device id to be handled by cache-sram-uio");
+#endif
static struct platform_driver uio_fsl_85xx_cache_sram = {
.probe = uio_fsl_85xx_cache_sram_probe,
.remove = uio_fsl_85xx_cache_sram_remove,
.driver = {
.name = DRIVER_NAME,
- .owner = THIS_MODULE,
- .of_match_table = uio_mpc85xx_l2ctlr_of_match,
+ .of_match_table =
of_match_ptr(uio_fsl_85xx_cache_sram_of_match),
},
};
Regards,
Wenhu
