Le 16/04/2020 à 17:35, Wang Wenhu a écrit :
Function instantiate_cache_sram should not be linked into the init
section for its caller mpc85xx_l2ctlr_of_probe is none-__init.

Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.le...@c-s.fr>
Cc: Scott Wood <o...@buserror.net>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Fixes: 6db92cc9d07d ("powerpc/85xx: add cache-sram support")
Signed-off-by: Wang Wenhu <wenhu.w...@vivo.com>

Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.le...@c-s.fr>


Warning information:
   MODPOST vmlinux.o
WARNING: modpost: vmlinux.o(.text+0x1e540): Section mismatch in reference from 
the function mpc85xx_l2ctlr_of_probe() to the function 
.init.text:instantiate_cache_sram()
The function mpc85xx_l2ctlr_of_probe() references
the function __init instantiate_cache_sram().
This is often because mpc85xx_l2ctlr_of_probe lacks a __init
annotation or the annotation of instantiate_cache_sram is wrong.
---
Changes since v1:
  * None
Changes since v2:
  * None
Changes since v3:
  * None
---
  arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_sram.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_sram.c 
b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_sram.c
index be3aef4229d7..3de5ac8382c0 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_sram.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_sram.c
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ void mpc85xx_cache_sram_free(void *ptr)
  }
  EXPORT_SYMBOL(mpc85xx_cache_sram_free);
-int __init instantiate_cache_sram(struct platform_device *dev,
+int instantiate_cache_sram(struct platform_device *dev,
                struct sram_parameters sram_params)
  {
        int ret = 0;

Reply via email to