Haren Myneni <ha...@linux.ibm.com> writes:
> On Mon, 2020-03-23 at 22:32 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> Nicholas Piggin <npig...@gmail.com> writes:
>> > Haren Myneni's on March 19, 2020 4:13 pm:
>> >>
>> >> Kernel sets fault address and status in CRB for NX page fault on user
>> >> space address after processing page fault. User space gets the signal
>> >> and handles the fault mentioned in CRB by bringing the page in to
>> >> memory and send NX request again.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <suka...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Haren Myneni <ha...@linux.ibm.com>
>> >> ---
>> >> arch/powerpc/include/asm/icswx.h | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
>> >> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/icswx.h
>> >> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/icswx.h
>> >> index 9872f85..b233d1e 100644
>> >> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/icswx.h
>> >> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/icswx.h
>> >
>> > "icswx" is not a thing anymore, after 6ff4d3e96652 ("powerpc: Remove old
>> > unused icswx based coprocessor support").
>>
>> Yeah that commit ripped out some parts of the previous attempt at a user
>> visible API for this sort of "coprocessor" stuff. VAS is yet another
>> attempt to do something useful with most of the same pieces but some
>> slightly different details.
>>
>> > I guess NX is reusing some
>> > things from it, but it would be good to get rid of the cruft and re-name
>> > this file and and relevant names.
>>
>> > NX already uses this file, so I guesss that can happen after this series.
>>
>> A lot of the CRB/CSB stuff is still the same, and P8 still uses icswx.
>> But I'd be happy if the header was renamed eventually, as icswx is now a
>> legacy name.
>
> We can move all macros and struct definitions to vas.h and remove
> icswx.h. Can I do this after this series?
Well they're still needed by the non-vas Power8 code, so that wouldn't
be quite right either :)
But yeah we can do whatever movement later as a cleanup.
cheers
