On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 03:41:39PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > You add about 30 lines of code in this patch, which you remove in patch > 3, is there a better way to do it? > > Is there any harm dynamically initialising the statically initialised > pacas, I think that would allow you to basically skip the > NR_STATIC_PACAS business.
Yes, I could make patch 2 the first in the series, and then roll batches 1 and 3 together. As iSeries will barf I do all the PACAs dynamically without that extra wait. /me is too linear. new version comming. Yours Tony linux.conf.au http://www.marchsouth.org/ Jan 19 - 24 2009 The Australian Linux Technical Conference! _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
