On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 14:06 +1000, Tony Breeds wrote: > As the pacas are statically initialised increasing NR_CPUS beyond 128, > means that any additional pacas will be empty ... which is bad. > > This patch adds the required functionality to fill in any excess pacas > at runtime. > > Signed-off-by: Tony Breeds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > ---
You add about 30 lines of code in this patch, which you remove in patch 3, is there a better way to do it? Is there any harm dynamically initialising the statically initialised pacas, I think that would allow you to basically skip the NR_STATIC_PACAS business. cheers -- Michael Ellerman OzLabs, IBM Australia Development Lab wwweb: http://michael.ellerman.id.au phone: +61 2 6212 1183 (tie line 70 21183) We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our children. - S.M.A.R.T Person
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
