On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:55:06AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > On Monday 21 April 2008 19:56, Scott Wood wrote: > > The memory-constrained platform I had in mind was 8xx, which doesn't use > > bitbanged MDIO. It might nice to keep the gpiolib bit separate to avoid > > situations such as ep8248e where mdiobb would be the only thing requiring > > a gpiolib binding, though -- but it shouldn't be two separate bitbang > > drivers, just the existing bitbang driver plus some glue code that binds > > it to gpiolib. > > I would be fine with that if the glue code wasn't 90% of the whole driver. > There is really little (not to say nothing) that can be shared between the > two drivers.
I think we're thinking of a different pair of drivers... I thought you were talking about duplicating drivers/net/phy/mdio-bitbang.c, not drivers/net/fs_enet/mii-bitbang.c. -Scott _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
