On Tue, 8 Apr 2008 04:41:28 +0200 Arnd Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Josh Boyer wrote: > > > > > > Actually, a static assignment to 0 has not caused the symbol to end up > > > in .data for many gcc versions, it always goes into .bss now unless you > > > assign it a value other than 0 or use explicit section attributes. > > > > IIRC, gcc 3.2 is still supported and it didn't do that. Old toolchains > > still exist. > > Ok, I thought it was before 3.2. The oldest version I had around was > gcc-3.3 and that had the new behaviour. http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/gcc-3.3/changes.html gcc 3.3.1 it seems. I thought I included that in the original reply, but it's late and I suck :). josh _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
